ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
The link between nutrient intake and anthropometric indices with COVID-19 infection in pregnant women.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe incidence and severity of COVID-19 complications in pregnant women may be significantly influenced by their nutritional status. So, the present study aimed to investigate the association between nutrient intake and anthropometric indices with COVID-19 infection in pregnant women.
methodsThis case‑control study was conducted on 117 pregnant women infected with COVID-19 as the case group, and 126 non-infected pregnant women as the control group. Information on demographic, social, anthropometric and biochemical indicators was collected. In both groups, food intake data were collected using a valid food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) covering the previous year.
resultsHigher vitamin D levels were associated with reduced odds of COVID-19 (OR = 0.93, CI95%:0.89-0.99, P = 0.02), even after adjusting for age, underlying diseases, caloric intake, and levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). No significant associations were observed between weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and other dietary nutrients with the risk of COVID-19.
conclusionPregnant women with insufficient dietary vitamin D intake are suggested to be at a significantly higher risk of COVID-19. Therefore, ensuring adequate vitamin D consumption is essential. It is recommended to conduct further longitudinal investigations to obtain more definitive results, particularly among pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.