SynthesisBMC public health2026
Dynamic models of occupational fatigue: a systematic review for risk management advancement.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOccupational fatigue is a major safety and health risk across work sectors. Because fatigue accumulates and fluctuates over time, effective fatigue management requires dynamic approaches that can anticipate risk and inform preventive controls rather than rely on point-in-time assessment. Although dynamic fatigue modelling has expanded rapidly, evidence remains fragmented across modelling paradigms and sectors, limiting clarity on which approaches are most suitable for implementation. This systematic review synthesises recent evidence on dynamic models of occupational fatigue and evaluates their relevance for fatigue management and risk control.
methodsRecords published from 2019 to 2025 were identified from Scopus using DOI-indexed retrieval and screened with Watase Uake Tools to support article mining and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews. Searches were complemented in PubMed, ProQuest, Wiley Online Library, and ScienceDirect. References were managed in Zotero, and screening, selection, and data extraction followed a structured process with manual searching and citation tracking.
resultsFrom 180 records, 12 peer-reviewed studies met the inclusion criteria. Four modelling approaches were identified: physiology-informed dynamic simulation, machine learning and deep learning for near real-time monitoring, probabilistic dynamic models such as Dynamic Bayesian Networks, and symptom-network or Bayesian graph approaches. Models were most useful for fatigue management when they integrated multimodal inputs and produced actionable outputs such as fatigue risk levels and intervention triggers, but implementation was limited by small samples and insufficient field validation.
conclusionFuture research should prioritize longitudinal workplace validation, harmonized benchmarking, and deployable hybrid models integrating physiological, psychosocial, and contextual determinants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.