ArticleBMC cancer2026
Timing and clinical burden of febrile neutropenia and treatment discontinuation during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFebrile neutropenia (FN) remains a major complication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and is a frequent cause of treatment disruption. However, FN is a heterogeneous clinical entity, and the impact of its timing and clinical severity on treatment continuity has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to characterize the timing and clinical burden of FN and to clarify their associations with treatment discontinuation during NAC.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 137 consecutive patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who received NAC. FN timing was assessed by chemotherapy cycle and days from NAC initiation, with early FN defined a priori as FN occurring at cycle ≤ 2. FN severity was evaluated based on the requirement for hospitalization. Treatment discontinuation was defined as premature discontinuation of NAC due to chemotherapy-related adverse events; dose reductions or treatment delays without permanent discontinuation were not included in this endpoint. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with treatment discontinuation.
resultsFN occurred in 18 patients (13.1%). The median time to FN onset was 46 days (interquartile range, 19-112), with half of FN events occurring by cycle 2. Although FN events were evenly distributed across chemotherapy cycles, cumulative incidence analysis revealed early clustering on a time-based scale. Hospitalization was required in 50.0% of patients with FN. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 8.4% of patients without FN, 11.1% of patients with non-hospitalized FN, and 44.4% of patients with hospitalized FN. Exploratory multivariable analyses demonstrated that hospitalized FN was associated with treatment discontinuation after adjustment for age and host-related factors (odds ratio, 11.20-13.33 across models), whereas low body mass index and reduced renal function were not independent predictors.
conclusionsThe impact of FN on treatment continuity during NAC appears to be determined by both its timing and clinical severity. FN requiring hospitalization, particularly when occurring early during NAC, was associated with an increased likelihood of treatment discontinuation. These findings underscore the importance of early identification and prevention of severe FN to optimize treatment delivery during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, while recognizing the statistical uncertainty inherent to the limited number of events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.