ArticleBMC neurology2026
Impact of migraine on work productivity of healthcare providers at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital.
Article in BMC neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
objectivesMigraine is more prevalent among healthcare providers (HCPs), which adversely affects the quality of life and work productivity. This study aimed to screen for migraine in HCPs working at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital and its drawbacks on work productivity.
methodsThis door-to-door survey was held at the workplace, targeting HCPs at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital. Migraine screening was conducted based on the migraine diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders- 3rd edition. Healthcare providers with migraines were requested to answer the Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-General Health Version (WPAI-GH). Absenteeism, presenteeism, and economic loss due to migraine were calculated.
resultsOne thousand one hundred seventy-nine HCPs working at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital agreed to participate in our survey. Only 387 (32.8%) participants met the diagnostic criteria of migraine, 31.8% of them had MIDAS grade-IV. The mean score of the WPAI-GH was 60.47 ± 40. The mean percent of absenteeism and presenteeism was 12.29% and 46%, respectively. The mean economic loss caused by absenteeism and presenteeism was $29.4 and $38.2, respectively. Participants with MIDAS grade-IV had significantly higher absenteeism, presenteeism, and economic loss than those in lower grades. Although 159 HCPs with migraine had indications for prophylactic treatment, only 73.6% received it.
conclusionAbout one-third of HCPs at Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital suffered from migraines, which negatively affected their work productivity, with higher presenteeism than absenteeism. Strenuous efforts should be directed toward reducing the cost burden associated with migraine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.