Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374256›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026

Temporal improvements in prehospital systems-of-care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients in Victoria, Australia: a retrospective study.

Andrew Bishop, Ziad Nehme, Dion Stub, Karen Murdoch, Ashanti Dantanarayana, Jesslyn Wijaya, Benjamin Meadley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew BishopDepartment of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Moorooduc Hwy, Frankston, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia. andrew.bishop@monash.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5408-6476
Ziad NehmeDepartment of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Moorooduc Hwy, Frankston, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Dion StubAmbulance Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Karen MurdochAmbulance Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ashanti DantanarayanaAmbulance Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jesslyn WijayaAmbulance Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Benjamin MeadleyDepartment of Paramedicine, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Moorooduc Hwy, Frankston, Melbourne, VIC, 3199, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehospital care is central to outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), yet how systems of care evolve over time remains incompletely described. This study aimed to evaluate the statewide temporal trends in prehospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care in Victoria, Australia, examining changes in epidemiology, clinical management, time metrics, and adverse events.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis using data from the Victorian Ambulance STEMI Quality Initiative (VASQI). Adults with suspected STEMI treated by paramedics between January 2018 and December 2023 were included. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, and compliance with a prehospital bundle of care (aspirin administration, First Medical Contact [FMC] to ECG ≤ 10 min, hospital notification, and transport to percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] facility) were analysed and further stratified into patients who received prehospital thrombolysis (PHT) or primary PCI (pPCI) reperfusion pathways. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests for trends were used.

resultsA total of 18,075 patients were included (median age 67 years, IQR 56-78; 69.7% men). The incidence of suspected STEMI was 58.2 cases per 100,000 person-years (≥ 18 years), increasing from 49.0 in 2018 to 59.5 in 2023 (p = 0.102). Bundle of care compliance was achieved in 69.1% of patients, increasing from 59.5% to 78.2% (+ 18.7% mean difference [MD], 95% CI 16.3-21.1; p for trend < 0.001). Improvements were observed in both PHT (MD, + 22.7%; 95% CI 13.9-31.4; p for trend < 0.001) and non-PHT reperfusion pathways (MD, + 18.4%; 95% CI 15.8-20.9; p for trend < 0.001). All bundle elements showed improvement: aspirin administration by 0.9% (95% CI 0.3-1.4; p for trend = 0.002), FMC to ECG ≤ 10 min by 8.7% (95% CI 6.6-10.8; p for trend < 0.001), hospital notification by 12.6% (95% CI 10.8-14.4; p for trend < 0.001), and direct transport to PCI by 0.9% (95% CI 0.0-1.9; p for trend = 0.046).

conclusionsParamedic compliance with the STEMI processes of care improved significantly over the study period. Although key clinical interventions for patients with STEMI have been delivered at high rates, opportunities remain to further optimise care, highlighting the importance of ongoing monitoring of clinical quality performance.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParamedicsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRetrospective StudiesThrombolytic TherapyVictoriaBundle of CareMyocardial InfarctionOut of hospitalQuality registrySTEMI

Identifiers

PMID42374256
PMCPMC13579834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.