ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
The relationship between psychological resilience and well-being among older adults.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPsychological resilience, the capacity to adapt positively in the face of adversity, has emerged as a key internal resource that may buffer older adults against stressors such as chronic illness, functional decline, bereavement, and social isolation. As populations age globally, understanding the role of resilience in sustaining quality of life becomes increasingly important for individuals, families, and healthcare systems.
aimTo examine the association between psychological resilience and well-being among older adults.
methodsUsing a cross-sectional design, a convenience sample of 196 volunteer older adults (≥ 65 years) was recruited from a university hospital setting, with data collected via face-to-face interviews to ensure clinical and cognitive suitability. Data were collected using the demographic characteristics form, the "Resilience Evaluation Scale," and "World Health Organization Well-Being Index".
resultsThe mean age of older adults was 68.07 ± 2.71. The average scores for "psychological resilience" and "well-being" were 22.47 ± 7.45 and 10.35 ± 6.39. The findings indicated a significant positive correlation between psychological resilience and overall well-being. While a significant difference was observed in resilience and well-being scores according to variables such as gender, educational status, having a chronic disease and having a relative who is a healthcare worker (P < 0.001), no significant difference was found in terms of other variables (P > 0.05).
conclusionAdults aged 65 and above in this study demonstrated a moderate level of resilience and lower well-being scores. Higher resilience scores were significantly correlated with increased subjective well-being. These results suggest that resilience acts as a vital internal resource that relates to mental health outcomes in the aging population, highlighting the potential for interventions focused on enhancing psychological strengths.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.