ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in data registration techniques have enabled researchers to analyze high-dimensional, low sample size (HDLSS) data, which poses challenges for traditional statistical and machine learning methods-especially in fields like neurodevelopmental disorder classification. Among various proposed solutions, the Data Maximum Dispersion Classifier (DMDC) has demonstrated superior performance. This study introduces two extensions: Sparse DMDC (SDMDC) and Longitudinal Sparse DMDC (LSDMDC), with the latter leveraging multi-way data frameworks. Simulated HDLSS datasets were generated from multivariate normal distributions with sparse structures. Evaluation of SDMDC involved varying class imbalance, predictor count, and correlation structures. Performance was measured via average F-measure and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Results showed that SDMDC outperformed other sparse models. Moreover, promising improvement was observed in model classification performance and the selection of effective predictors when the correlation between predictor variables was increased. In longitudinal simulations, LSDMDC maintained performance even as the number of predictors increased along the first dimension, effectively handling rank-1 and rank-2 data. Notably, LSDMDC achieved the best results under autoregressive correlation. In conclusion, SDMDC demonstrated clear advantages over other sparse classifiers, while LSDMDC proved highly effective for complex longitudinal structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.