Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374240›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026

Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data.

Zahra Zolghadr, Hamid Alavi Majd, Mohammad Rouzbeh, Yadollah Mehrabi, Amir Eftekhari Moghadam, Salman Safdari, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zahra ZolghadrNational Center for Health Insurance Research, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid Alavi MajdDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad RouzbehDAYCHE GROUP Research Division, Tehran, Iran.
Yadollah MehrabiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. mehrabi@sbmu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9837-4956
Amir Eftekhari MoghadamDepartment of Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Salman SafdariDepartment of Neuroscience and Addiction Studies, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI Duygu Tosun-Turgut · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in data registration techniques have enabled researchers to analyze high-dimensional, low sample size (HDLSS) data, which poses challenges for traditional statistical and machine learning methods-especially in fields like neurodevelopmental disorder classification. Among various proposed solutions, the Data Maximum Dispersion Classifier (DMDC) has demonstrated superior performance. This study introduces two extensions: Sparse DMDC (SDMDC) and Longitudinal Sparse DMDC (LSDMDC), with the latter leveraging multi-way data frameworks. Simulated HDLSS datasets were generated from multivariate normal distributions with sparse structures. Evaluation of SDMDC involved varying class imbalance, predictor count, and correlation structures. Performance was measured via average F-measure and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Results showed that SDMDC outperformed other sparse models. Moreover, promising improvement was observed in model classification performance and the selection of effective predictors when the correlation between predictor variables was increased. In longitudinal simulations, LSDMDC maintained performance even as the number of predictors increased along the first dimension, effectively handling rank-1 and rank-2 data. Notably, LSDMDC achieved the best results under autoregressive correlation. In conclusion, SDMDC demonstrated clear advantages over other sparse classifiers, while LSDMDC proved highly effective for complex longitudinal structures.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansLongitudinal StudiesModels, StatisticalSample SizeSignal-To-Noise RatioClassificationData maximum dispersion classifierHigh-dimensional low-sample-size dataLongitudinal sparse DMDCMultiway data

Identifiers

PMID42374240
PMCPMC13539708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.