ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026
Reversible coma and elevated central venous pressure: warning signs of acute superior vena cava graft thrombosis following Warden procedure: a case report.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A review of bloodstream infections-pathogens, pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, treatment methods-challenges and future aspects.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Warden procedure effectively corrects partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection (PAPVC) draining into the superior vena cava (SVC), yet superior vena cava obstruction remains a serious potential complication. This report describes a rare case of acute prosthetic graft thrombosis in the SVC following Warden procedure, presenting primarily with rapid neurological deterioration and initially lacking typical signs of superior vena cava syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old female patient underwent a Warden procedure with autologous pericardial tube reconstruction of the superior vena cava. Postoperatively, her central venous pressure (CVP) progressively increased from 12 mmHg to a peak of 28 mmHg. Concurrently, her level of consciousness deteriorated from mild coma to deep coma with brainstem reflex suppression. Emergency cranial CT revealed no hemorrhage or significant edema. The combination of elevated CVP and deteriorating neurological function suggested acute SVC obstruction, prompting emergency exploration. Intraoperatively, extensive thrombosis within the autologous pericardial graft was confirmed. After replacement with a large-bore bovine pericardial graft, venous return was restored. The patient regained consciousness 8 h after the second surgery with no neurological sequelae.
conclusionsAcute superior vena cava (SVC) obstruction can directly cause severe neurological dysfunction due to impaired cerebral venous return and reduced cerebral perfusion pressure. During the perioperative period, even in the absence of facial/neck edema or positive cranial CT findings, immediate investigation of superior vena cava anastomotic patency is warranted upon detection of abnormally elevated central venous pressure (CVP) accompanied by altered mental status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.