ArticleBMC microbiology2026
The gut microbiome in the Lebanese population and its alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer: benchmarking and application.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer (CRC) is a rising health concern in Lebanon and across the Arab world, concomitant with dietary and lifestyle transitions. The gut microbiome may contribute to CRC progression and treatment response, and it remains understudied in Arab populations. This pilot study investigates gut microbiome dynamics in a cohort of stage IV CRC patients and cancer-free individuals from Lebanon, benchmarking computational tools for 16S rRNA sequencing and analyzing microbial and functional shifts associated with cancer development and therapy.
methodsStool samples were collected from cancer-free individuals (n = 32) and newly diagnosed stage IV CRC patients before therapy (n = 17). A subset of CRC patients (n = 10) provided follow-up samples 3-6 months after therapy. 16S rRNA microbial profiling was conducted using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Computational tools were benchmarked using a mock community, with a defined microbial composition. Microbiome and functional analyses included diversity metrics, differential abundance testing, and pathway prediction, with adjustments for age and sex, followed by sensitivity analyses accounting for antibiotic use and immunotherapy.
resultsAmong the evaluated computational tools, USEARCH was selected for downstream CRC microbiome analyses based on its performance. CRC patients exhibited progressive dysbiosis, characterised by distinct beta diversity profiles, reduced alpha diversity and a declining Firmicutes/Bacteroidota ratio from cancer-free controls to baseline CRC and post-therapy samples. Differential abundance analysis identified taxa associated with CRC development and therapy response, including Fusobacterium, Muribaculaceae, Intestinimonas, Intestinimonas butyriciproducens and Lactobacillus fermentum. Notably, some potentially beneficial taxa increased progressively across the disease and treatment continuum, suggesting that therapy may promote specific favorable microorganisms while coinciding with broader microbiome dysregulation. Functional pathway analysis revealed widespread alterations in microbial functional capacity, including potential therapy-associated shifts.
conclusionThis study represents a pioneering effort in gut microbiome profiling of Lebanese population with advanced CRC, establishing a molecular reference map during a period of rising CRC incidence and dietary transition. Computational benchmarking using a mock community supported the robustness of the analytical workflow. The results may facilitate the discovery of microbial signatures associated with CRC development and therapy response, providing insights into cancer prevention and clinical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.