ArticleCommunications chemistry2026
Assessing crystallisation behaviour in molecular crystals through particle rugosities.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surface properties of molecular crystals play a central role in determining their nucleation, growth, and overall crystallisation behaviour. In particular, surface rugosity has been suggested as a meaningful descriptor of how readily a crystal may nucleate and grow, but the existing rugosity metrics have been limited by incomplete descriptions of surface topology. In this study, we present a new workflow for the computation of surface descriptors across crystal facets. Here the surface rugosity description for each facet is based on the Surface Area Ratio (SAR) definition proposed in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) tools. Given a crystal structure, our algorithm computes an average overall particle rugosity with three offset selection criteria that account for different crystallisation conditions. We then calculate particle rugosities and analyse data for a range of systems, including: polymorphic families, datasets from the CSD, and crystal structure prediction (CSP) landscapes. Our analysis shows that, in most cases, polymorphs with lower rugosities tend to nucleate and grow more readily, suggesting that this metric can distinguish experimentally accessible forms from more elusive ones. These findings demonstrate that particle rugosities can serve as a complementary tool for predicting and classifying the experimental feasibility of polymorphs generated computationally.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.