Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374097›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Proactive detection of voice phishing networks using call log analysis and machine learning.

Kyungjong Kim, Lanu Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyungjong KimGraduate School of Data Science, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea.
Lanu KimSchool of Digital Humanities and Computational Social Sciences, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, 34141, Republic of Korea. lanukim@kaist.ac.kr.

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea N01260884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voice phishing represents a rapidly evolving form of cyber-enabled financial fraud that exploits telecommunications networks to deceive victims. Traditional reactive policing approaches face significant limitations in preventing such crimes in real time. This study introduces a data-driven framework for the proactive detection of phone numbers linked to voice phishing operations using large-scale call log data from South Korea. Behavioral features derived from call metadata were utilized to capture distinctive communication patterns that differentiate fraudulent users from legitimate ones. A stepwise logistic regression model was initially employed to identify key predictors of fraudulent behavior, followed by advanced machine learning models-including random forest, gradient boosting, and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)-for classification. The results reveal that voice phishing numbers display unique behavioral characteristics, such as concentrated weekday activity, shorter call durations, higher outgoing call ratios, and a preference for Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO) usage. The proposed models achieved high performance, exceeding 95% accuracy and 97% recall, demonstrating their robustness in detecting suspicious numbers. These findings underscore the potential of integrating artificial intelligence and behavioral analytics into proactive fraud detection systems and contribute to the development of early-warning mechanisms for preventing telecommunication-based financial crimes.

Indexed as

Call log analysisLogistic regressionMachine learningProactive crime preventionTelecom fraudVoice phishing

Identifiers

PMID42374097
PMCPMC13490453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.