Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42374084›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Dynamic multi-period optimal power flow considering renewable energy degradation and temperature derating.

Bassem Khaled, Almoataz Y Abdelaziz, Mahmoud A Attia, Amr K Khamees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bassem KhaledDepartment of Electrical Power and Machines, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Almoataz Y AbdelazizDepartment of Electrical Power and Machines, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mahmoud A AttiaDepartment of Electrical Power and Machines, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Amr K KhameesDepartment of Engineering Physical and Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. amr.khaled@eng.asu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-4731

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, play vital role in reducing emissions of carbon dioxide and combating climate change. However, their stochastic behavior has an impact on modern electric networks. Hence, Modelling variability and uncertainty in optimal power flow (OPF) concerns is critical for ensuring dependable and environmentally friendly grid operations. This study investigates the impact of climate change on the integration of wind and solar energy into power systems, with a specific focus on how temperature variations affect the performance and optimal dispatch of wind turbines and solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. To minimize total costs and carbon emissions, both single-objective and multi-objective optimization problems are developed, incorporating temperature-dependent de-rating effects on PV modules and wind turbines. Mayfly algorithm (MA) is applied to the IEEE-30 bus system for Optimal Power Flow (OPF), achieving a 0.6% and 0.5% reduction in fuel cost and carbon emissions compared to PSO and further techniques in single-objective OPF. The study extends to Stochastic OPF (SOPF) on a modified IEEE-30 system with two wind farms and one PV plant. Where, temperature-dependent models are used for both wind energy and solar energy. To additionally encourage and increase the reliance on renewable energy, Carbon credit concept is added to the total cost objective function as novel contribution. The results show that when the carbon credit is taken into account the total cost is reduced by 0.8% compared to the case when it is not considered. To assess the climate change impact, it is found that at 40 °C, the total cost and emissions increase by 21% and 45.67% respectively when minimizing cost, and by 9.67% and 45.7% when minimizing emissions. The multi-period analysis evaluates the evolution of renewable penetration over the 25-year lifetime by considering the gradual reduction in renewable output caused by annual degradation and temperature-related derating. The renewable penetration limits are therefore updated across the planning period to reflect the reduced contribution of PV and wind generation over time. where, this impact is on total cost and carbon emissions over 25-year lifetime through both single and multi-objective dynamic Multi-Period SOPF (MPOPF) problem. For single-objective MPSOPF problem, after 25 years, the results at 40 °C show that the total cost and emissions increase by 24.96% and 51.8% respectively when minimizing the total cost compared to the results obtained at the beginning of wind and solar plants operation. Moreover, Multi-Objective SOPF is solved, a fuzzy-based Pareto front is used, the outcomes show that when the ambient temperature rises to 40 °C, the compromise solution shows an increase of 16.65% total cost and 41.87% carbon emission respectively. For Multi-Objective MPSOPF problem, at 40 °C, the compromise solution shows a 20.16% cost and 60.1% emission increase after 25 years compared to the case when the temperature rise and degradation effect are not taken into account. The findings reveal that climate change and degradation adversely affect renewable energy integration, resulting in increased reliance on thermal power and emphasizing the need for informed planning of sustainable energy infrastructures and re-powering the renewable energy resources at the end of their lifetime.

Indexed as

Carbon emissionsClimate changeDegradationMayfly algorithmMulti-period optimal power flowStochastic optimal power flowTemperature de-rating

Identifiers

PMID42374084
PMCPMC13315268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.