ArticleScientific reports2026
Effect of muscle fatigue on cycling asymmetry during a constant-power test.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Asymmetry in cycling may reduce mechanical efficiency and increase the risk of overuse injuries, particularly as fatigue develops. While asymmetry is often assessed using global power output, analyzing directional force components may reveal biomechanical patterns more relevant to performance and injury. In this study, we investigated the effect of progressive fatigue on bilateral asymmetry in power and pedal force components during a submaximal constant-power cycling test. Twenty healthy recreational participants performed prolonged cycling at 70% of their individual peak power until exhaustion while three-dimensional pedal forces were recorded using an instrumented ergometer. Asymmetry was quantified using the Normalized Symmetry Index (NSI) for power and for tangential, radial, and mediolateral force components, and evaluated at five time points representing progressive fatigue. Fatigue did not significantly alter mean relative interlimb asymmetry in power output or pedal force components as quantified by NSI, nor did it significantly change mean absolute interlimb force or power differences. However, cycle-to-cycle variability of the asymmetry measures and absolute interlimb differences changed across time, suggesting that fatigue influenced variability in limb coordination rather than producing a systematic shift in mean left-right force sharing. Asymmetry also differed significantly between force directions, with mediolateral forces showing the largest NSI range (-10% to 8%) compared to radial (-3% to 6%) and tangential (-7% to 3%) forces. These findings suggest that, in healthy individuals performing seated constant-power cycling, fatigue-related changes may be expressed more strongly through variability and direction-specific force behavior than through systematic changes in mean relative or absolute interlimb asymmetry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.