Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42373993›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

Psychometric functions from multiple responses : Dedicated to the memory of Colin L. Mallows.

Saul Sternberg, Ronald L Knoll, Colin L Mallows

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saul SternbergUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. saul@psych.upenn.edu.
Ronald L KnollRetired, Austin, TX, USA.
Colin L Mallows, Flemington, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By using three or more ordered response categories and varying the stimulus feature being judged over a large range, it is possible to generate a family of psychometric functions (PMFs), each based on a different partition of the responses. An earlier paper showed how, when it is treated as a probability distribution, the traditional single PMF based on binary-choice data can be decomposed into sensory and decision components, expressed as two independent random variables that are summed to create the PMF. Here we extend this development to the multiple-response procedure, and use it to elucidate the relations among the spreads and shapes of the resulting family of PMFs, which can be described by their first four cumulants. For example, we determine conditions under which the PMFs can have the same spread and shape, differing only by translation on the stimulus axis. Whereas PMFs depend on both sensory and decision processes, differences among the PMFs in a family depend only on the decision processes. Application of this multiple-PMF method to several decision models, whose evaluations depend on the PMF cumulants, shows it to have greater power than the single-PMF method for understanding the perceptual process. Although this work was inspired by experiments on the perception of temporal order, it can be applied to experiments where features of stimuli other than their occurrence times are being compared, such as the pitch of tones or the brightness of lights.

Indexed as

MemoryPsychometricsAnimalsDecision MakingHumansPerceptionPerceptual-decision modelsPsychometric functionPsychophysicsTemporal-order judgment

Identifiers

PMID42373993
PMCPMC13315315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.