SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2026
Single-stapled versus non-single-stapled colorectal anastomosis in minimally invasive anterior resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnastomotic leak remains a major cause of morbidity after anterior resection for rectal cancer. The single-stapled technique (SST) has been proposed to eliminate crossover of intersecting staple lines in conventional non-single-stapled techniques (NSST). However, evidence comparing the two approaches in minimally invasive anterior resections remains limited.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 guidelines (PROSPERO CRD420251053461). Randomised and observational studies comparing SST versus NSST in adult minimally invasive anterior resections were included. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak and length of hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included operative time, postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III), and mortality. Random-effects models were used to pool effect estimates.
resultsFive observational studies (n = 1647; SST = 587, NSST = 1060) met inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis demonstrated that SST significantly reduced anastomotic leak rates compared with NSST (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.26-0.70; p = 0.0007; I
conclusionsSingle-stapled anastomosis in minimally invasive anterior resection is associated with a lower pooled risk of anastomotic leak compared with non-single-stapled techniques. Despite heterogeneity in secondary outcomes, SST appears to be a promising technical refinement; however, randomised trials are required before routine adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.