ArticleEye (London, England)2026
Development of a deep learning model to predict cycloplegic myopia and pre- myopia: based on a large-scale screening of school-aged children.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting hyperopic reserve in children based on school-based vision programs with ensemble learning.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to develop and validate practical deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models to predict cycloplegic myopia, pre-myopia, and non-myopia in school-aged children using non-cycloplegic parameters, thereby facilitating early detection and intervention.
methodsA cross-sectional study enrolled 3,077 children aged 6-10 years from Tianjin, China. Ocular parameters, including non-cycloplegic dioptre sphere (DS), axial length (AL), corneal curvature (K1, K2), and sex, were incorporated into four single multi-class classification models: CatBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), and TabPFN (a tabular DL model). Performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and SHAP analysis for interpretability.
resultsThe TabPFN model demonstrated slightly higher overall performance (AUC = 0.89), with AUCs of 0.93 for myopia and 0.78 for pre-myopia prediction. AL emerged as the most influential feature, while K2 contributed to model predictions alongside other biometric parameters. Decision curve analysis demonstrated clinical utility for combined pre-myopia+myopia classification at intermediate thresholds.
conclusionThe TabPFN model outperformed traditional ML models in accurately classifying myopia and pre-myopia using non-cycloplegic parameters, offering a practical tool for large-scale school screenings. AL was the dominant contributor to model predictions, while K2 provided complementary information within the multivariable framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.