Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42373898›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026

Safety and Effectiveness in 400 Image-Guided Spleen Biopsies from the DeGIR Registry.

R Ocker-Serger, M Opitz, L Klüner, M Drews, D Rosok, L Salhoefer, M Forsting, J Haubold, B M Schaarschmidt, S Zensen

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

R Ocker-SergerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. Raya.Ocker-Serger@uk-essen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-0141-1302
M OpitzInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
L KlünerInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
M DrewsInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
D RosokInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
L SalhoeferInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
M ForstingInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
J HauboldInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
B M SchaarschmidtInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
S ZensenInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate technical success, diagnostic yield, and complication rates of image-guided percutaneous splenic biopsies based on multicenter registry data from the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective multicenter study analyzed image-guided percutaneous splenic biopsies documented in the prospective DeGIR registry between 2018 and 2024. Technical success was defined as needle placement within the target lesion. Diagnostic yield was defined as histologically adequate samples enabling clinical diagnosis.

resultsFour hundred splenic biopsies from 92 centers were included. Technical success was achieved in 99.00% of procedures. The complication rate was 5.00%, including 2.50% major complications with no procedure-related deaths. Complication rates were higher for procedures performed under local anesthesia than analgesic sedation (p = 0.042). Histopathological reports were available for 338 procedures, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 90.83%. Diagnostic yield increased with the number of biopsy samples, reaching a maximum with three samples. Procedures performed under analgesic sedation showed a higher diagnostic yield than those under local anesthesia (p = 0.019).

conclusionImage-guided percutaneous splenic biopsy is a safe and effective diagnostic procedure with high technical success and diagnostic yield. Analgesic sedation and obtaining up to three biopsy samples may improve diagnostic performance without increasing complication rates.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyRadiography, InterventionalSpleenSplenic DiseasesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesComplication rateDiagnostic yieldImage-guided biopsySplenic biopsy

Identifiers

PMID42373898
PMCPMC13429531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.