ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
T-cell replete haploidentical transplantation compared to mismatched unrelated allogeneic transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: A study from the ALWP/EBMT.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative option for secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide has improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, enabling the broader use of alternative donors. For patients lacking a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor, haploidentical donor (Haplo) or 9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HSCTs are widely used, yet their relative effectiveness in sAML is uncertain. We retrospectively compared outcomes after Haplo versus MMUD HSCT in adults with sAML in first complete remission transplanted between 2010 and 2022. Among 711 patients, 602 received Haplo and 109 MMUD grafts. Patient and transplant characteristics differed between cohorts, including donor age, conditioning intensity, graft source, and transplant year. Neutrophil recovery was faster after MMUD transplantation, while platelet recovery was comparable. Rates of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival were similar. Reduced intensity conditioning lowered acute GVHD risk, while peripheral blood grafts increased chronic GVHD. Lower Karnofsky score, older age and adverse-risk cytogenetics were adverse prognostic factors. Haplo and MMUD transplantation demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety with post-transplant cyclophosphamide, supporting both approaches as viable alternatives in the absence of an HLA-matched donor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.