Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42373850›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026

T-cell replete haploidentical transplantation compared to mismatched unrelated allogeneic transplantation with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission: A study from the ALWP/EBMT.

Sarah Kayser, Arnon Nagler, Allain Thibeault Ferhat, Jaime Sanz, Raynier Devillier, Yener Koc, Anna Maria Raiola, Alessandro Busca, Alexander Kulagin, Jan Vydra and 12 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Sarah KayserDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Arnon NaglerDivision of Hematology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. arnon.nagler@sheba.health.gov.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0763-1265
Allain Thibeault FerhatEBMT Paris study office; Department of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital; INSERM UMR 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.
Jaime SanzHematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Departament de Medicina Universitat de Valencia, de Valencia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-4619
Raynier DevillierTransplantation and cellular immunotherapy program, Department of Hematology, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Management Sport Cancer Lab, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4045-8310
Yener KocMedicana International Hospital Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
Anna Maria RaiolaIRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Alessandro BuscaS.S. Trapianto di Cellule Staminali, Torino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5361-5613
Alexander KulaginRM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-4136
Jan VydraInstitute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czechia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-3895
Maija Itala-RemesTurku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Stefania BramantiIstituto Clinico Humanitas, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4117-7991
Giovanni GrilloDepartment of Hematology and Bone marrow Transplantation GOM Niguarda, Milano, Italy.
Zafer GulbasAnadolu Medical Center Hospital, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Jiri PavluImperial College London at Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Montserrat RoviraBMT Unit, Hematology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Simona SicaDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio ed Ematologiche-Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli-IRCCS, Sezione di Ematologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologiche, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-3465
Alessandro RambaldiDepartment of Oncology-Hematology, University of Milan and Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3739-7502
Eolia BrissotDepartment of Hematology and Cell Therapy, Hospital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4471-418X
Ali BazarbachiBone Marrow Transplantation Program, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7171-4997
Mohamad MohtyEBMT Paris study office; Department of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital; INSERM UMR 938, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-808X
Fabio CiceriOspedale San Raffaele, Haematology and BMT, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0873-0123

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative option for secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Post-transplant cyclophosphamide has improved graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, enabling the broader use of alternative donors. For patients lacking a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor, haploidentical donor (Haplo) or 9/10 HLA mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) HSCTs are widely used, yet their relative effectiveness in sAML is uncertain. We retrospectively compared outcomes after Haplo versus MMUD HSCT in adults with sAML in first complete remission transplanted between 2010 and 2022. Among 711 patients, 602 received Haplo and 109 MMUD grafts. Patient and transplant characteristics differed between cohorts, including donor age, conditioning intensity, graft source, and transplant year. Neutrophil recovery was faster after MMUD transplantation, while platelet recovery was comparable. Rates of acute and chronic GVHD, relapse incidence, non-relapse mortality, overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and GVHD-free/relapse-free survival were similar. Reduced intensity conditioning lowered acute GVHD risk, while peripheral blood grafts increased chronic GVHD. Lower Karnofsky score, older age and adverse-risk cytogenetics were adverse prognostic factors. Haplo and MMUD transplantation demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety with post-transplant cyclophosphamide, supporting both approaches as viable alternatives in the absence of an HLA-matched donor.

Indexed as

CyclophosphamideHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteT-LymphocytesTransplantation ConditioningTransplantation, HaploidenticalAdolescentAdultFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedRemission InductionRetrospective StudiesTransplantation, HomologousCyclophosphamide

Identifiers

PMID42373850
PMCPMC13569454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.