Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42373825›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2026

Optimizing Subcutaneous Antibody Dosing Regimens Through Operating Space Maps: rHuPH20 Case Study.

Ryan P Nolan, Harish Chintakuntla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan P NolanHalozyme Therapeutics, 12390 El Camino Real, San Diego, CA, 92130, USA. publications@halozyme.com.
Harish ChintakuntlaHalozyme Therapeutics, 12390 El Camino Real, San Diego, CA, 92130, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic antibody dosing regimens are often constrained by formulation and administration factors that limit flexibility in dose and schedule. Subcutaneous (SC) delivery offers advantages over intravenous (IV) administration-such as improved convenience and potentially more favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles-but is typically restricted by injection volume, requiring lower doses and more frequent dosing. Recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) enables rapid administration of high-dose, high-volume therapeutics, thereby expanding the feasible SC delivery landscape. Despite these advances, biopharmaceutical development teams often lack tools to quantify the strategic impact of SC-enabling technologies and interpret PK simulations in a decision-ready format. This work introduces Operating Space Maps, a visual PK simulation framework that organizes multiple dosing scenarios into an intuitive landscape of dose-frequency options. Using rHuPH20 as a case study, a two-compartment PK model is applied to simulate representative antibody regimens for two illustrative scenarios: converting IV regimens to SC with rHuPH20 and extending SC dosing intervals beyond standard limits with rHuPH20. For example, relative to a 1000 mg IV benchmark regimen, a 1400 mg SC dose with rHuPH20 maintains equivalent average exposure while reducing C

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalHyaluronoglucosaminidaseCell Adhesion MoleculesComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleHumansInjections, SubcutaneousModels, BiologicalRecombinant ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalCell Adhesion Moleculeshyaluronidase PH-20HyaluronoglucosaminidaseRecombinant ProteinsAntibodiesDose optimizationDrug deliveryHyaluronidasePharmacokineticsSubcutaneous

Identifiers

PMID42373825
PMCPMC13314913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.