SynthesisNature human behaviour2026
Prevalence and severity of mental health problems in early-career researchers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Job insecurity is chipping away at me and my cohort. Is it us, or the state of the economy?Nature · 2026Article
- What breaks when federal commitments break: comment on Beccia et al.SSM. Mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health concerns among early-career researchers (ECRs) have gained attention, but prevalence and severity estimates remain fragmented. Here we conducted a preregistered systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024596813) to quantify psychological distress among ECRs. Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC and PubMed were searched through 28 October 2025, yielding 148 studies and four primary databases (k = 228; N = 138,446). On the basis of validated case-identification thresholds, 29.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.1-33.9%) of ECRs report elevated psychological distress across all outcomes. Specifically, pooled estimates indicated that 29.8% (26.1-33.8%) reported elevated depressive symptoms, 29.7% (25.7-33.8%) anxiety symptoms, 28.3% (23.6-33.3%) eating disorder symptoms, 22.9% (18.4-27.9%) alcohol misuse, 18.6% (14.4-23.2%) non-suicidal self-injury and 18.8% (15.2-22.6%) suicidal ideation. The prevalence of depressive symptoms was approximately two to three times higher and anxiety symptoms three to five times higher than in age-matched general-population samples. Symptom severity estimates, capturing mean symptom levels on continuous scales, on average were 'mild' for depressive and anxiety symptoms and 'moderate' for stress. Moderator analyses showed that outcome and scale type accounted for the largest share of variance, whereas demographic and individual characteristics had limited associations with prevalence and severity estimates. These findings underscore the need for structural reforms and implementation of evidence-based support services for ECRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.