ArticleScientific reports2026
Sequential mediation linking perceived government autonomy support and public-sphere water conservation intentions via autonomy satisfaction and intrinsic motivation in karst regions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Karst regions render groundwater both invisible and vulnerable, raising the question of how autonomy-supportive governance relates to community stewardship. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory, we examined whether Perceived Government Autonomy Support is associated with Public-Sphere Water Conservation Intentions indirectly via sequential associations with Autonomy Satisfaction and Intrinsic Motivation, and whether Self-Referencing conditions these associations. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in karst communities in Guangxi, China (N = 406) and estimated a moderated serial mediation model. Results showed a positive direct association between Perceived Government Autonomy Support and Public-Sphere Water Conservation Intentions and indirect associations through Autonomy Satisfaction and Intrinsic Motivation, consistent with the sequential path from Perceived Government Autonomy Support to Autonomy Satisfaction to Intrinsic Motivation to Public-Sphere Water Conservation Intentions. Self-Referencing positively moderated the association between Perceived Government Autonomy Support and Autonomy Satisfaction, such that the association was stronger at higher levels of Self-Referencing, and the corresponding conditional indirect associations through Autonomy Satisfaction, and through Autonomy Satisfaction followed by Intrinsic Motivation, increased with Self-Referencing. These findings extend Self-Determination Theory to the governance of invisible groundwater and suggest that Self-Referencing may function as a boundary condition for autonomy-supportive communication. Practically, although the cross-sectional design and the use of self-reported measures limit conclusions about sustained water-conservation practices, autonomy-supportive, person-centred communication that signals choice and respect and leverages locally resonant narratives may support community participation and help foster water stewardship intentions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.