ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2026
A 9-year retrospective mortality review of captive orange-bellied parrots (Neophema chrysogaster) in Australia.
Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The orange-bellied parrot (Neophema chrysogaster) (OBP) is a critically endangered migratory parrot found in south-eastern Australia. A long-standing conservation recovery programme includes monitoring and support of the wild population and a multi-site captive insurance population. While disease represents a threatening process to the OBP, minimal information about causes of mortality in this species has been published. A systematic review of necropsy reports from the captive OBP metapopulation over a 9-year period (2010-2019) was undertaken to quantify and analyse the causes of mortality of captive OBPs. Infectious disease was the most common cause of death (35%), including respiratory aspergillosis and a range of bacterial infections, followed by trauma (7%). Confirmed or suspected Psittacine Beak and Feather Disease caused few deaths overall (1.4%) but caused an outbreak of juvenile and subadult mortality at one facility in 2019. Necropsy records alone were insufficient to determine the contribution of this infection to captive population health beyond these cases. Disease occurrence varied with site and age class; in particular, aspergillosis and mycobacteriosis were each more common at two separate sites, offering opportunities for further investigation of disease risk factors that could include environmental, husbandry and pathogen factors. A high proportion of cases (46%) could not be assigned a cause of death, though diagnostic success increased with age class, year of study and when histology was performed in younger age classes. These findings are relevant to future conservation decisions for the OBP, particularly resource allocation for research and diagnostics, and have broader interest to veterinarians, pathologists, ecologists and captive management specialists. Our findings also reinforce the importance of consistency in necropsy investigations and pathological terminology and the need for accessible and standardised mortality records for conservation programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.