Observational studyBMJ global health2026
Identifying delays to emergency laparotomy in a low-resource setting using the Three Delays Model: a prospective observational study (DEL study).
Observational study in BMJ global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOver the last decade, there has been a global emphasis on prioritising disparities in surgical care in low- and middle-income countries. The Three Delays Model, originally developed for maternal mortality, has been increasingly applied to surgical and injury populations, yet few studies have quantified delay predictors for emergency abdominal surgery in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to identify where the longest delays in accessing emergency laparotomy are, determine factors associated with delays and identify delays associated with mortality.
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational study of 240 consecutive emergency laparotomy patients at a tertiary referral centre in Lusaka, Zambia (April 2024 to April 2025). Data were collected from patients or caregivers and medical record review by the research team during the postoperative phase of care using a questionnaire. Using the Three Delays Model, variables were collected for each of the following delays: (1) seeking care, (2) reaching care and (3) receiving care. The primary outcome was time spent in each delay. Multivariable linear regression on log₁₀-transformed delay times was used to identify predictors of the first and second delays across the full analytic cohort. Logistic regression assessed delays associated with in-hospital mortality.
resultsAmong 240 patients, the median total time from symptom onset to emergency laparotomy was 34 hours. The longest delay occurred in the seeking care phase, with a median of 18.5 hours (IQR: 2-72 hours), followed by reaching care with a median of 7.5 hours (IQR: 3-29.5 hours) and receiving care with a median of 8 hours (IQR: 6-11 hours). On multivariable log10 linear regression, believing symptoms would resolve and being referred from another facility predicted prolonged first delay. Predictors of prolonged second delay included less urgent surgical indication, education status and referral status. There were 28 in-hospital deaths (11.7%). Time in the first delay was associated with mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.008, p=0.006).
conclusionsThe longest delays to emergency laparotomy in Zambia occurred before patients entered the health system. Symptom misperception and referral from other facilities were the strongest modifiable predictors of delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.