ArticleLupus science & medicine2026
Antiphospholipid syndrome in the paediatric population: performance of ACR-EULAR classification criteria in a controlled cohort.
Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAntiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disorder marked by thrombotic and non-thrombotic manifestations. In children, diagnosis remains challenging due to lack of validated paediatric criteria. As the 2006 revised Sapporo has been used without validation, and the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR-EULAR) classification system based on a more modern disease improves specificity; however, their performance and applicability in the paediatric population have not yet been extensively vetted.
objectiveThis study evaluates the performance of the ACR-EULAR APS criteria in a paediatric cohort of APS and antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) patients, focusing on key diagnostic parameters and comparison with traditional criteria.
methodsA retrospective review of 69 patients' ≤18 years followed at the Sheba Medical Center (2011-2024) was conducted. Clinical, laboratory and serological data including anti-cardiolipin, anti-β2GPI, lupus anticoagulant as well as APS score (adjusted Global Antiphospholipid Syndrome Score, aGAPSS) were analysed. Patients were divided into APS patients (n=29) or aPL carriers (controls; n=40). APS diagnosis was made based on expert opinion and validated by two independent experts.
resultsIn our cohort (mean age 16 years; 62% female). APS diagnosis was more common among those with a family history of APS (37.5% vs 17.5%; p=0.056). Comparing APS patients and aPL carriers, unprovoked venous thrombosis (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.36) and aGAPSS OR 1.053 (1.031 to 1.076) and platelet number (OR 0.999, 95% CI 0.998 to 1) were the strongest predictors of APS. Moreover, non-thrombotic manifestations such as heart valve disease, livedo reticularis and diffuse alveolar haemorrhage were only present in the APS group. Catastrophic APS rate was 10.3% among our APS group. Mortality rate was 6.7% among APS group and 0% among aPL carriers.In the paediatric population, the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with the 2006 Sapporo criteria, characterised by a higher positive likelihood ratio (18.23 vs 16.43) and a lower negative likelihood ratio (0.036 vs 0.136), effectively improving both the rule-in and rule-out capacity for APS diagnosis.
conclusionsThe superior sensitivity and likelihood ratio of the 2023 ACR-EULAR criteria suggest they may be a valuable tool for the classification of paediatric APS; however, further prospective validation is essential to optimise their clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.