Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42372691›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental cognitive neuroscience2026

Pubertal timing predicts resting-state functional connectivity of cortical networks.

Soudeh Ashrafipour, Nandita Vijayakumar, Niousha Dehestani, Samuel Berkins, Timothy J Silk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Soudeh AshrafipourCentre for Social and Early Emotional Development and School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia. Electronic address: s.ashrafipour@deakin.edu.au.
Nandita VijayakumarCentre for Social and Early Emotional Development and School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: nandi.vijayakumar@deakin.edu.au.
Niousha DehestaniCentre for Sleep and Cognition & Centre for Translational Magnetic Resonance Research, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore; Healthy Longevity & Human Potential Translational Research Program and Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: newsha_d@nus.edu.sg.
Samuel BerkinsCentre for Social and Early Emotional Development and School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia. Electronic address: s.sylas@deakin.edu.au.
Timothy J SilkCentre for Social and Early Emotional Development and School of Psychology, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia. Electronic address: tim.silk@deakin.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPubertal timing has profound implications for adolescent brain development and mental health outcomes; yet its influence on cortical resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) remains under explored. This study investigated whether individual differences in pubertal timing predict large-scale cortical rs-FC patterns during adolescence. Pubertal timing was quantified as puberty age gap (PAG); the difference between a model-predicted 'puberty age' and chronological age; where positive values reflect earlier timing and negative values indicate later timing.

methodsLeveraging data from the ABCD Study (N ≈ 3500), we examined the associations between PAG and resting-state functional connectivity across 12 large-scale brain networks defined by the Gordon parcellation. In addition to computing PAG using both physical and hormonal features, we also attempted to tease apart the contribution from adrenal and gonadal phases of maturation, and from physical (Pubertal Developmental Scale (PDS) items) vs hormonal features (testosterone, estradiaol, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)). Cross-sectional associations between PAG and rs-FC, as well as prospective associations between PAG and change in rs-FC, were assessed separately in males and females.

resultsCross-sectionally, earlier pubertal timing (defined as a greater PAG) was associated with altered resting-state functional connectivity patterns within and between key large-scale cortical networks. Most associations showed similar directional patterns to normative age-related rs-FC development, while a subset of associations involving higher-order control and executive systems appeared to be specific to pubertal timing. The most implicated connections involved primary sensorimotor, attention/salience, and control/executive networks, with patterns evident in both sexes but more wide spread in males. The longitudinal analyses yielded weaker associations relative to the cross-sectional findings, with no effects surviving FDR correction.

conclusionsThis study highlights the relevance of pubertal timing, beyond chronological age, in shaping cortical functional connectivity, particularly within sensorimotor, salience, and higher-order control networks. While many associations paralleled normative age-related rs-FC development, others appeared distinct from those observed for chronological age, suggesting that pubertal timing may explain additional variability in adolescent brain organization beyond age alone.

Indexed as

BrainCerebral CortexNerve NetPubertyAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysSexual MaturationNeurodevelopmentNeuroendocrinePubertal timingPubertyResting-state functional connectivity

Identifiers

PMID42372691
PMCPMC13330690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.