ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Age-Specific N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Thresholds for Heart Failure Diagnosis in China: Protocol for a Markov Model-Based Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) imposes a substantial clinical and economic burden in China. Although N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is widely used in the diagnostic pathway for HF, conventional thresholds are largely derived from Western populations and may not be fully applicable to Chinese adults.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an exploratory age-specific NT-proBNP threshold strategy compared with a conventional universal threshold strategy for HF diagnosis in China.
methodsWe developed a hybrid decision-analytic model linking an initial diagnostic decision tree to long-term Markov state-transition pathways. The target population comprised adults aged ≥45 years with symptoms suggestive of HF who underwent further clinical diagnostic evaluation. The China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study was used to inform the baseline demographic and comorbidity structure. Two diagnostic strategies were compared: (1) an exploratory age-specific NT-proBNP strategy using thresholds of 100 ng/L for individuals aged <65 years and 248 ng/L for those aged ≥65 years and (2) a conventional threshold strategy using 125 ng/L as the comparator cutoff. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Chinese health care system. Primary outcomes included direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The base-case analysis used a 10-year time horizon, with annual discounting of 5% for both costs and health outcomes. Parameter uncertainty will be assessed using deterministic sensitivity analysis, probabilistic sensitivity analysis with 5000 Monte Carlo simulations, and scenario analyses.
resultsThis study was funded in January 2025. Model construction has been completed, and parameter collection, calibration, and validation are ongoing. The final cost-effectiveness analysis is expected to be completed after project-specific Chinese data become available. Planned outputs include total costs, quality-adjusted life-years, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, diagnostic classification outcomes, and cost-effectiveness acceptability results.
conclusionsThis protocol will assess whether age-specific NT-proBNP thresholds provide economic or clinical advantages over a conventional universal threshold strategy in the Chinese health care setting. The findings are intended to inform future diagnostic policy while explicitly acknowledging uncertainty surrounding the exploratory age-specific thresholds and other structural assumptions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/95071.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.