ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Operationalizing Digital Health Equity in Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Patient Decision Aids for Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence-enabled patient decision aids (AI-PDAs) hold promise for supporting older adults with chronic diseases in accessing personalized health information, clarifying preferences, and engaging in shared decision-making. Achieving equity in their design requires attention to the complex health care and digital contexts in which these tools are used. While the Digital Health Equity Framework (DHEF) provides a conceptual foundation, practical strategies for its application remain limited.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify equity-related determinants and generate actionable design strategies for applying the DHEF to AI-PDAs for older adults.
methodsA mixed methods study was conducted. Semistructured interviews were conducted with older adults living with hypertension and/or diabetes, health care providers, and medical students to explore equity determinants relevant to AI-PDAs. In parallel, a review of reviews synthesized existing evidence on approaches to addressing these determinants. Interview findings and review findings were integrated through an iterative mapping process conducted by the research team and refined through multidisciplinary expert consultation involving medicine, public health, social services, and computer science.
resultsA total of 33 stakeholders were interviewed, including 15 older adults, 8 health care providers, and 10 medical students. Thirteen reviews were included in the umbrella review. The integrated synthesis identified equity determinants spanning individual, interpersonal, community, and societal levels across both the health care and digital environments, together with cross-level concerns related to algorithmic fairness. These findings informed 5 recommendations for equitable AI-PDA development: (1) co-design with end users to address their needs, (2) embrace relationship-centered design, (3) leverage community resources to improve support, (4) promote accessible and equitable artificial intelligence (AI) governance in society, and (5) enhance equitable AI through algorithmic fairness. Together, these recommendations provide practical guidance for design, pilot testing, implementation, and evaluation.
conclusionsBy integrating stakeholder perspectives with synthesized review evidence, this study extends the DHEF from a primarily conceptual framework toward a more practice-oriented approach for AI-PDAs for older adults with chronic disease. Health care settings serve as a mediating sociotechnical context where AI tools may either support or constrain equitable care participation. The findings underscore the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to align technological innovation with equity-oriented design. Future work should focus on co-designed prototypes, real-world testing, and measurable equity outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.