Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42372248›Full record

ArticleNursing ethics2026

Using consentless practices on medical wards-A qualitative study.

Joar Björk, Niklas Juth, Tove Godskesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing ethics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joar BjörkCentre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7194-4875
Niklas JuthCentre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Tove GodskesenCentre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundIn contrast to legally mandated coercive care in psychiatry, there is a paucity of studies on the use of coercive practices within somatic healthcare.AimTo gain an in-depth understanding of the practices used by nurses and other staff to provide somatic healthcare interventions to ill patients in the absence of informed consent.Research designFocus-group interviews were held, and the collected data were analyzed qualitatively using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.Participants and research contextParticipants (

Indexed as

coercionconsentdecision-making capacityhospital staffnursingprofessionalism

Identifiers

PMID42372248
PMCPMC13687627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.