ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
Feasibility and optimal imaging time window for intraperitoneal versus intravenous injection of a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent in mice.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of intraperitoneal injection as an alternative to the technically challenging intravenous route for contrast agent administration in murine brain magnetic resonance imaging by comparing their enhancement effects. Specifically, it sought to determine the optimal injection dose and imaging time window for administration of gadobutrol, a macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent, in orthotopic glioblastoma models.MethodsThis study used an orthotopic glioblastoma model established in BALB/c nude mice (n = 24) by intracranial implantation of LN229 cells. Mice were randomized to receive gadobutrol at doses of 1 or 2 mmol/kg via both intravenous and intraperitoneal routes on separate days. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was performed at multiple post-injection time points. The resulting images were evaluated qualitatively by blinded neuroradiologists and quantitatively by measuring signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio, with statistical comparisons made between injection methods and dosage groups.ResultsImage quality assessments revealed no significant differences in signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, or enhancement metrics between the intravenous and intraperitoneal routes. Peak enhancement occurred at 7 min following intravenous injection and 30 min following intraperitoneal injection.ConclusionsIntraperitoneal injection is a viable alternative, with scanning at 30 min recommended for optimal contrast enhancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.