ArticlePloS one2026
Ad-based social media interventions increase belief accuracy and generate pro-social opinions among non-news readers.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Democratic challenges are often attributed to the spread of misleading, untrustworthy, or biased information, leading scholars to focus on minimizing exposure to such "bad" content online. Instead, we introduce a scalable intervention to put factual and verified public affairs information in users' social media feeds to make them better informed and more resilient to various online threats. We conducted 48 field quasi-experiments using Instagram ads targeting news non-users to enhance their belief accuracy, democratic attitudes, and behavioral intentions related to climate change, COVID-19 vaccines, media literacy, and election integrity. The treatment videos reached 2,496,878 Instagram accounts, 690,470 users watched at least 50% of the video, and 40,584 of those users completed post-test assessment. The intervention was effective: 46 out of 48 of the quasi-experiments had positive effect sizes and 40 out of 48 achieved statistical significance. The intervention predicted not only belief accuracy but also attitudes, media literacy, and - to some extent - behavioral intentions related to vaccination. These patterns emerged across topics, did not dissipate with time (two of three climate change quasi-experiments show continued effects), and were not contingent on persuasive appeals and format features presented in the ads.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.