ArticlePloS one2026
Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and -C on wound healing in wild-type mice.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether periwound subcutaneous administration of vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), VEGF-C, or both promotes wound healing in wild-type (WT) mice. A total of 40 9-week-old male BALB/c mice were used in this study. Two circular full-thickness skin wounds were created. Mice were treated with VEGF-A on day 4 after wound creation (VEGF-A group), VEGF-C on day 7 after wound creation (VEGF-C group), or VEGF-A and VEGF-C (VEGF-A + C group). The control group received subcutaneous saline injections on days 4 and 7. Photographs were taken, the wound area was measured, and the covering materials were changed for 15 days. Lymphography was performed before wound harvest. Tissues were harvested 4, 7, 10, and 14 days after wound creation and stained for lymphatic and blood vessels. The wounds in each group healed almost identically. No significant differences were observed between the VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-A + C groups and the control group throughout the observation period. Similarly, no significant difference in the number of lymphatic and blood vessels within the granulation tissue after wound creation was observed between the VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-A + C groups and the control group. Collecting lymphatic vessels did not regenerate across the wound, whereas capillary lymphatic vessels regenerated within the wound. Endogenous repair responses in acute wounds in WT mice progress relatively rapidly, and angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis are sufficiently induced without VEGF-A or VEGF-C. Therefore, additional exogenous VEGF-A or VEGF-C may provide little incremental benefit, consistent with a ceiling effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.