ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Exploring patient perspectives on a new task-shared behavioral health role in Washington State.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Organizational Barriers and Facilitators to a New Bachelor's-Level Behavioral Health Role.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2026Article
- Exploring patient perspectives on a new task-shared behavioral health role in Washington State.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health provider shortages lead to substantial treatment gaps for mental health services worldwide, including throughout the United States. Task-sharing, in which providers with no or limited prior training in mental health care are trained to deliver psychological interventions, is a leading strategy to increase capacity, yet it has been under-utilized in the US to date. Recent legislative changes are starting to enable opportunities for task-sharing mental healthcare in the US. A leading example is Washington State's introduction of the Behavioral Health Support Specialist (BHSS), a supervised bachelors-level mental health provider role. However, little is known about patient perspectives on task-sharing mental health care within US settings. Our study engaged potential future patients at two integrated care clinics (n = 40) using mixed methods data collection (semi-structured individual interviews and brief structured surveys adapted from the acceptability and appropriateness sub-scales of the Mental Health Implementation Science Tools) to explore potential patient perspectives on the perceived acceptability and appropriateness of these reforms in the US. We identified three main qualitative themes: (1) Overall, potential patients reported that they perceived task-shared mental health care to be acceptable; (2) Potential patients reported familiarity with task-sharing from other clinical and community settings; and (3) Potential patients shared hesitations and questions that are important for implementers and educators to address. Quantitatively, most participants reported moderate to strong support for receiving care from a task-shared mental health provider. Given that legislative reform expanding care delivery via these roles is already well underway, our findings can help support successful implementation of a bachelor's level mental health provider role. Though the scope of this bachelor's level role is currently limited to Washington, other states are exploring introducing similar roles to their mental health workforce, so these findings may be applicable nationwide.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.