Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371916›Full record

ArticlePLOS mental health2026

Exploring patient perspectives on a new task-shared behavioral health role in Washington State.

Alexandra L Rose, Olga Vitruk, Brenna N Renn, Lydia Chwastiak, William P O'Connell, Anna Ratzliff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra L RoseUniversity of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9689-0834
Olga VitrukUniversity of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Brenna N RennUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas Department of Psychology, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America.
Lydia ChwastiakUniversity of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-7934
William P O'ConnellUniversity of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Anna RatzliffUniversity of Washington Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health provider shortages lead to substantial treatment gaps for mental health services worldwide, including throughout the United States. Task-sharing, in which providers with no or limited prior training in mental health care are trained to deliver psychological interventions, is a leading strategy to increase capacity, yet it has been under-utilized in the US to date. Recent legislative changes are starting to enable opportunities for task-sharing mental healthcare in the US. A leading example is Washington State's introduction of the Behavioral Health Support Specialist (BHSS), a supervised bachelors-level mental health provider role. However, little is known about patient perspectives on task-sharing mental health care within US settings. Our study engaged potential future patients at two integrated care clinics (n = 40) using mixed methods data collection (semi-structured individual interviews and brief structured surveys adapted from the acceptability and appropriateness sub-scales of the Mental Health Implementation Science Tools) to explore potential patient perspectives on the perceived acceptability and appropriateness of these reforms in the US. We identified three main qualitative themes: (1) Overall, potential patients reported that they perceived task-shared mental health care to be acceptable; (2) Potential patients reported familiarity with task-sharing from other clinical and community settings; and (3) Potential patients shared hesitations and questions that are important for implementers and educators to address. Quantitatively, most participants reported moderate to strong support for receiving care from a task-shared mental health provider. Given that legislative reform expanding care delivery via these roles is already well underway, our findings can help support successful implementation of a bachelor's level mental health provider role. Though the scope of this bachelor's level role is currently limited to Washington, other states are exploring introducing similar roles to their mental health workforce, so these findings may be applicable nationwide.

Identifiers

PMID42371916
PMCPMC13313332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.