Observational studyPloS one2026
Circulating biomarkers of bronchoalveolar injury help predict the need for mechanical ventilation in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 pneumonia: A prospective cohort study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSevere respiratory failure is a major complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the need for mechanical ventilation (MV) is associated with a worse outcome. Whether some soluble biomarkers of lung injury can help predict MV requirement remains unclear.
methodsThis prospective, observational, monocentric cohort study consecutively enrolled patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia within 48 h of hospital admission. The serum concentrations of five key bronchoalveolar epithelial and endothelial biomarkers were determined at Day 0, 7 and 14: Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6); soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products (sRAGE); club cell protein 16 (CC16); angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2); and soluble CD146 (sCD146). The respiratory severity of COVID-19 pneumonia was defined by the maximal level of respiratory support received during hospitalization: oxygen (by mask or nasal prong); high flow oxygen therapy (HFOT); and MV. End-points were the need for MV during hospitalization and the time to liberation from oxygen.
resultsFifty-four COVID-19 patients were enrolled; 23 (43%) required MV, 13 (24%) HFOT, and 18 (33%) oxygen. At inclusion, levels of KL-6, sRAGE, and CC16 were significantly higher in MV compared with non-MV patients (p < 0.05), with sRAGE showing the greatest difference (2.4-fold increase). In multivariate logistic regression, sRAGE (OR per 1000 pg/mL increase 1.316; 95% CI [1.040-1.667]; p = 0.022) and SpO2/FIO2 (OR 0.984; 95% CI [0.970-0.998]; p = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for MV. Furthermore, patients with an sRAGE ≥ 5449 pg/mL at inclusion had a lower probability of weaning from oxygen at Day 60 (HR 0.36; 95% CI [0.19-0.67]; p = 0.001). From Day 7 to Day 14, CC16 levels increased while sCD146 levels decreased in MV patients.
conclusionAmong five circulating biomarkers of bronchoalveolar injury, sRAGE showed the most favorable kinetic profile, rapidly increasing in MV patients. The early measurement of sRAGE and SpO2/FIO2 upon hospital admission may effectively identify COVID-19 patients at high risk of requiring MV and prolonged oxygen support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.