ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Employment status, occupational profile, and common mental disorders among workers in urban informal settlements in Brazil.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban informal settlements (referred to as favelas in Brazil), reflect longstanding socioeconomic and racial inequalities and are home to a workforce frequently exposed to precarious employment conditions. This study describes the socio-occupational characteristic and estimates the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs) among workers residing in five urban informal communities in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. A cross-sectional epidemiological study (n = 587) was conducted with formal and informal workers aged 18-70 years. The outcome was measured using the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-SRQ-20, and associations were evaluated using Poisson Regression, with analysis stratified by employment type. Data analysis was performed using R 3.6.0 + software. The overall prevalence of CMD was 14.0%, increasing to 22.7% among informal workers. In the adjusted analysis of the overall sample, informal employment and persistent fear of job loss were associated with a higher prevalence of mental health problems, whereas the 40-49 age groups showed a lower prevalence of CMD compared with younger workers. In stratified analyses, female sex and job insecurity were associated with CMD among formal workers, while lower monthly income (<$181) was associated with CMD among informal workers. This pioneering study highlights the role of precarious employment conditions in the social determination of mental health distress among residents of urban informal communities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.