ArticlePloS one2026
The experience of individuals following non-surgical management of Achilles tendon rupture in the United Kingdom - a qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesDespite extensive research on Achilles tendon ruptures (ATR), the lived experience of patients remains under explored. This study aimed to investigate the experiences of individuals managed non-surgically within the National Health Service (NHS).
designQualitative study using semi-structured, one-to-one interviews.
settingNHS services in the United Kingdom providing non-surgical management for ATR.
participantsFifteen patients (mean age 54.5 years) who had sustained an ATR and were managed non-surgically. Participants were recruited from a specialist ATR clinic.
methodsA stakeholder-informed topic guide was used to conduct semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was undertaken independently by two researchers, with themes reviewed by the full research team. The study followed COREQ guidelines for qualitative reporting.
resultsThree themes were identified: (1) The experience of injury and entering the healthcare system: 'it felt as if my whole ankle had exploded' participants described sudden injury onset, sometimes painless, and varied understanding of treatment options; (2) The experience of non-surgical immobilisation: 'you're being told so much in that first session…I just couldn't remember' boot immobilisation was valued for mobility but challenged comfort and self-management; and (3) The rehabilitation journey: 'it happened so unexpectedly so it can happen again' fear and uncertainty about rehabilitation and returning to sport were common, shaping participant's rehabilitation experience.
conclusionsThis study highlights how diverse ATR injury experiences, early management variability, and boot-related challenges impact recovery. Fear of re-rupture shapes rehabilitation and return to sport, emphasising the need for clearer guidance on boot use, weightbearing, and rehabilitation progression, alongside consistent healthcare professional support to optimise outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.