ArticlePloS one2026
Cultural capital and health literacy among urban communities in Malaysia: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Health literacy is an important determinant of health outcomes, yet many approaches continue to emphasize individual cognitive skills while giving limited attention to the sociocultural resources that shape how people engage with health information. This study examined the association between cultural capital and multiple dimensions of health literacy among urban communities in Malaysia. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 325 adults residing in selected urban communities in Ipoh, Perak. A cluster-based approach was used to identify study locations, followed by community-based convenience recruitment within selected clusters. Cultural capital was assessed across embodied, objectified and institutionalized dimensions, while health literacy was measured using the validated HLS-M-Q18 instrument, which captures access, understanding, evaluation and application of health information. All constructs demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.822 to 0.931). Spearman's rank correlation was used for bivariate analysis due to non-normality, while multiple linear regression estimated the independent contribution of each form of cultural capital to each health literacy domain. Cultural capital was significantly associated with all dimensions of health literacy (p < 0.001). Institutionalized cultural capital was the strongest predictor of access (β = 0.298, p < 0.001) and understanding (β = 0.305, p < 0.001), whereas embodied cultural capital was the only significant predictor of evaluation (β = 0.537, p < 0.001) and the strongest predictor of application (β = 0.359, p < 0.001). Cultural capital explained between 28.2% and 41.9% of the variance across outcomes. Differences were also observed across education and income levels. These findings indicate that health literacy is not determined by access to information alone but is shaped by broader social and cultural resources. Public health interventions should therefore move beyond information provision and strengthen the experiential and contextual capacities that enable individuals to evaluate and apply health information in everyday life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.