ArticleThe British journal of radiology2026
Airway imaging practices in primary ciliary dyskinesia: a global survey to guide standardized guidelines.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAirway imaging guidelines for primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) are currently limited. Given the progressive nature of this disease, standardized imaging protocols, particularly at key clinical milestones such as diagnosis, routine reviews, and exacerbations, may improve monitoring of disease progression, support comparison of outcomes across centers, and provide robust parameters for clinical trials.
methodsTo document current practices, we conducted a global survey of PCD clinicians. An online questionnaire was distributed via international PCD networks, covering imaging use at diagnosis, during routine assessments, and at exacerbations treated with oral or intravenous antibiotics. Responses were received from 120 clinicians across 90 centers in 33 countries. Modalities assessed included X-ray, CT scans, MRI, and ultrasound, with analyses stratified by center type and size.
resultsAt diagnosis, 94% of clinicians reported using imaging. Chest X-ray was most common for children under 5 years (55%), whereas CT was preferred for older patients (66%). During routine assessments, 67.5% of clinicians used imaging, but timing and modality varied, with CT more frequent in pediatric and mixed centers. Imaging during exacerbations differed by treatment route: chest X-ray was the most common modality, used by 57.1% for oral antibiotic-treated episodes and 73.3% for intravenous episodes. CT use was higher with intravenous treatment (15.8% vs. 4.2%).
conclusionsAlthough practices varied, consistent trends at diagnosis and follow-up highlight opportunities for consensus. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Standardized imaging protocols could enhance clinical care, enable meaningful research comparisons, and improve outcomes in PCD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.