Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371746›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2026

Leaf Size in Conifers: Global Associations With Climate and Evolutionary History.

Katya I Bandow, Timothy J Brodribb, Benjamin Halliwell, Matilda J M Brown, Kate M Johnson, Gregory J Jordan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katya I BandowSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0442-9480
Timothy J BrodribbSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4964-6107
Benjamin HalliwellSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2033-4799
Matilda J M BrownRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2536-8365
Kate M JohnsonCentre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3039-6339
Gregory J JordanSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6033-2766

Funding

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global analyses of leaf size suggest that large leaves predominate in favourably warm and wet climates, and small leaves occur at climatic extremes. However, these patterns are dominated by data from angiosperms and may obscure drivers of leaf size variation in older, less speciose groups, such as conifers. Here we employ a novel modelling framework, multi-response phylogenetic mixed models (MRPMM), that identifies trait correlations at both phylogenetic and phylogenetically independent levels to investigate how climate influences leaf size evolution across conifers. We show overall patterns for all conifers and focus on three groups with distinctive leaf architectures: scale-leaved Cupressaceae, needle-leaved Pinus and broad-leaved Podocarpus. We found moderate to strong phylogenetic signal in conifer leaf and climate niche traits. Phylogenetic relationships explained most of the association between leaf size and climate, with temperature revealed as a stronger driver than dry season precipitation, indicating deep-time co-evolutionary associations. These patterns reflect trade-offs associated with leaf hydraulic architecture under contrasting selection pressures. In single-veined leaves, lateral water transport and thus leaf width is constrained, yet this narrow leaf form can be advantageous for survival under climatic extremes such as drought and freezing. In contrast, anatomical innovations (like accessory transfusion tissue in Podocarpus) allow for broader leaves which are favourable in competitive environments, while also potentially making leaves more vulnerable to climate extremes. Our results support previous evidence for phylogenetic niche conservatism in conifers, where species tend to track their ancestral climatic preferences rather than adapting to new environments. This conservatism, likely controlled by leaf hydraulic architecture, results in strong evolutionary constraints on current bioclimatic distributions and potential responses to changing climates in conifers. This study also highlights the importance of considering phylogenetic impacts on functional trait evolution, especially in evolutionarily conservative groups like conifers.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionClimatePlant LeavesTracheophytaPhylogenyclimatic associationconifersleaf sizephylogeneticstrait evolution

Identifiers

PMID42371746
PMCPMC13313166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.