ReviewArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2026
Healthy short stature.
Review in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Goodbye, idiopathic short stature: why "healthy short stature" is a necessary advancement.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathicshort stature (ISS) has been used for more than five decades to label children whose height is below -2 SDS without an identified underlying cause. Although originally conceived as a pragmatic diagnosis of exclusion, ISS has gradually been reified as a disease entity and is now embedded in clinical guidelines, regulatory frameworks and indications for recombinant human growth hormone therapy. In parallel, advances in genomic technologies have uncovered a growing spectrum of monogenic and chromosomal variants among children previously classified as ISS, and highlighted the continuous, polygenic architecture of height in the remainder. These developments render the idiopathic construct increasingly misleading and unstable, as every new etiological discovery shrinks - and conceptually undermines - the ISS category. In this article, we review the historical evolution and current use of ISS, summarize the impact of modern genetic testing on the classification of short stature, and argue that most children currently labeled as having ISS are better described as having "Healthy Short Stature". We define Healthy Short Stature as short stature in otherwise healthy children without systemic, syndromic or endocrine disease, in whom short stature represents the lower extreme of normal growth variation. We discuss how adopting Healthy Short Stature can reduce stigma, remain compatible with ongoing genetic investigation, and provide a more robust framework for aligning clinical practice, research and health policy with contemporary knowledge of human growth biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.