ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2026
Structural Variation Sequencing of 26 Amniotic Fluid Samples With Partial Gene Duplications and Postnatal Follow-Up of the Fetuses.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPartial gene duplications (PGDups) are a significant contributor to genetic disease. The precise genomic location and structure of PGDups are often unresolved using conventional methods, so prenatal diagnosis for PGDups is challenging, especially without ultrasound abnormalities.
methodsWe retrospectively applied structural variation sequencing (SVseq) to 26 amniotic fluid samples with PGDups initially identified by chromosomal microarray or sequencing. SVseq utilized mate-pair library construction and high-throughput sequencing to map PGDup structures. Pathogenicity was classified using ACMG guidelines, followed by postnatal phenotypic follow-up.
resultsSVseq deciphered the PGDup structure for all twenty-six cases. Twenty-two (84.62%) were tandem duplications (TDs), three (11.54%) chromosomal complex rearrangements (CCRs), and one (3.85%) had no duplication. Among twenty-two TDs, thirteen were extragenic (TDEG), preserving gene integrity, and were classified as benign or variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Nine were intragenic (TDIG), disrupting gene structure, and were rated pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) or VUS. Postnatal follow-up revealed obvious abnormal phenotypes in only two TDIG cases (one inherited and one de novo).
conclusionSVseq effectively resolves PGDup location and structure, allowing confident pathogenicity assessment and clear genotype-phenotype correlation. SVseq is a robust method for prenatal PGDup evaluation that could be adopted in diagnostic protocols to improve clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.