Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371601›Full record

ReviewDigital health

From brain scans to classifiers: A systematic review of ML-based autism diagnostic frameworks.

Naveed Ur Rehman Ahmed, Ayesha Tajammul, Afzal Badshah, Muhammad Saad, Abdulrahman Ahmed Gharawi, Ammar Almutawa, Sakher Ghanem, Ali Daud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Naveed Ur Rehman AhmedDepartment of Computing, Hamdard University, Islamabad Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6957-837X
Ayesha TajammulU.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies in Water, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan.
Afzal BadshahDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3444-4609
Muhammad SaadDepartment of Computer Science, Virtual University of Pakistan, Lahore, Pakistan.
Abdulrahman Ahmed GharawiComputer Science Department, Al Jumoum University College, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, Saudi Arabi.
Ammar AlmutawaDepartment of Information Systems and Technology, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Sakher GhanemDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ali DaudFaculty of Resilience, Rabdan Academy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a lifelong neurodevelopmental condition affecting social interaction, communication, and behavior, with traditional diagnosis relying on subjective and time-consuming behavioral assessments. Advances in neuroimaging have enhanced understanding of the brain mechanisms underlying ASD. Objective: This systematic review aimed to comprehensively examine ASD classification datasets and recent advancements in ASD diagnosis using neuroimaging modalities, and to analyze machine learning techniques for ASD diagnosis to evaluate their diagnostic performance in terms of accuracy and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Methods: The review followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search (2021-2025) was conducted across major databases, including Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM, ScienceDirect, MDPI, and Springer. Results: Out of 2,329 initially identified records, 825 were screened for eligibility after title and abstract review. The final analysis included 107 studies, which predominantly used structural and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Electroencephalography, and multimodal datasets for ASD classification. The most common classifiers were Convolutional Neural Networks, Support Vector Machines, Random Forests, and hybrid Deep Learning (DL) models. Studies reported performance metrics such as accuracy and AUC, with many showing promising diagnostic results. Key limitations included small sample sizes, lack of external validation, dataset imbalance, and limited generalizability across multi-site datasets. Conclusion: Neuroimaging-based Machine Learning (ML) offers strong potential for improving ASD diagnosis but faces challenges in reproducibility, interpretability, dataset variability, and clinical translation. Future work should focus on multi-site validation, explainable AI, and standardized evaluation to ensure reliable, real-world applications.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceASDautism diagnosticDLML

Identifiers

PMID42371601
PMCPMC13310339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.