ArticleDigital health
Multi-sensor fusion for differentiating swallows between healthy adults and patients with post-stroke dysphagia.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to develop a non-invasive method using multi-sensor fusion to discriminate between abnormal swallows in patients with post-stroke dysphagia and normal swallows in healthy individuals. Methods: Acceleration signals, nasal airflow signals, and sound signals were obtained from 108 healthy adults and 108 post-stroke dysphagia patients. Each swallowing signal was segmented according to videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), followed by features extraction and selection. Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Regression models were employed to discriminate between normal swallows in healthy individuals and abnormal swallows in post-stroke dysphagia patients. Results: Overall, classification models utilizing signals from multi-sensor demonstrated superior performance when compared to signals from single-sensor and dual-sensor. Among the five models, the Support Vector Machine model (accuracy: 91.39±3.03%; specificity: 89.53±4.09%; sensitivity: 92.99±2.84%; F1-score: 91.86±2.92%) and Logistic Regression model (accuracy: 91.00±2.71%; specificity: 89.88±3.77%; sensitivity: 91.97±2.70%; F1-score: 91.45±2.55%) have better overall performance for classification. Conclusions: The multi-sensor fusion has shown promising ability in differentiating swallows in healthy adults from those in patients with post-stroke dysphagia. The findings may provide an important foundation for the use of non-invasive multi-sensor fusion methods to identify dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.