ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Web-based versus simulation-based refresher training in newborn life support: A randomized multicenter noninferiority controlled trial.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regular training for healthcare professionals in newborn life support is life-saving. Web-based refresher has the potential to be non-inferior to simulation-based refresher training. Methods: The multicenter non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in six hospitals Level I-IV in Germany. Following an initial full-scale, high-fidelity simulation training, we compared a web-based refresher with a simulation-based refresher. The professionals were assessed at three points in time, using a pseudonymised questionnaire and a Megacode test, scores added up to a sum score. Assessment was performed prior to, and immediately after the initial training and three months after the intervention. The primary aim was to analyze whether a web-based refresher is non-inferior in avoiding skill decay. Participation at the refresher and recurring errors were secondary outcomes. Results: Of 228 randomized healthcare professionals, 139 (web-based refresher group Conclusion: Although underpowered to make a firm inference, our results suggest that web-based refresher is non-inferior compared to simulation-based refresher training, even in practical skills and shows a higher participation rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.