Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371554›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2026

Use of a Customized Milled Metal Surgical Guide for Esthetic Crown Lengthening: A Case Report.

Abdulkareem Alhumaidan, Sarah Fita

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdulkareem AlhumaidanDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah FitaDepartment of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5006-0069

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Excessive gingival display (EGD) resulting from altered passive eruption (APE) is a clinical condition that is commonly managed by esthetic crown lengthening to achieve stable and symmetrical gingival margins. Determining the appropriate gingival and osseous resection levels remains a key step in achieving predictable surgical outcomes. Although digitally printed resin guides have been widely discussed, clinical data regarding milled metal dual-purpose guides remain limited. Patients and Methods: This single case report (n=1) describes the digital workflow for designing and fabricating a dual-purpose cobalt-chromium surgical guide to assist both gingivectomy and osteoectomy. The guide dimensions were determined by superimposing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data with intraoral scan files to identify the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). The guide was fabricated using a subtractive milling process and used during esthetic crown lengthening in a patient diagnosed with altered passive eruption type I. Results: The milled metal guide appeared to provide stable positioning during surgery and helped guide both soft- and hard-tissue resection. At 6-month follow-up, gingival margins remained stable, symmetrical contouring was achieved, patient satisfaction was high, and no immediate postoperative complications were observed. Conclusion: This report presents a CBCT-integrated workflow for dual-purpose surgical guidance. The rigidity of the milled metal framework may assist intraoperative stability and support favorable short-term clinical outcomes in this case.

Indexed as

CAD/CAMcone-beam computed tomographycrown lengtheningdigital workflowguided surgerymilled metal guide

Identifiers

PMID42371554
PMCPMC13310401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.