Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371480›Full record

ArticleaBIOTECH2026

Decoding enzymatic landscapes: a knowledge graph-enhanced large language model framework for microbial enzyme production and catalysis systems.

Qichang Tong, Lincong Zhou, Xu Liu, Xiaoqing Liu, Ningfeng Wu, Yuan Wang, Huiying Luo, Bin Yao, Jian Tian, Dongfei Han and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in aBIOTECH, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Qichang TongCollege of Animal Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Lincong ZhouSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, 215009, China.
Xu LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xiaoqing LiuNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Ningfeng WuNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yuan WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Huiying LuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Bin YaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Jian TianState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Dongfei HanSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, 215009, China.
Xianghua YanCollege of Animal Sciences and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Feifei GuanNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Biotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial enzyme production and catalysis systems are crucial aspect of biotechnological research. However, building them from trustworthy published experimental data presents a major obstacle for both manual and automated techniques. Here, we introduce MEPAM (Microbial Enzyme Production and Catalytic Activity based on LLM), a question-answering system designed to accurately address inquiries related to enzyme production and catalytic reactions. Specifically, by training three machine learning models with >0.98 accuracy, we identified 11,068 high-quality, relevant articles from the Web of Science. Leveraging DeepSeek-V3 with zero-shot learning, we developed an ontology-driven knowledge representation that extracted 12,434 entities and 35,918 relations with 0.78 extraction accuracy and constructed a structured knowledge graph. Compared to few-shot learning and other machine learning methods, our framework achieved significantly higher extraction accuracy. Using this framework, we developed MEPAM based on retrieval-augmented generation and prompt engineering. Finally, using MEPAM, we extracted a comprehensive network involving the expression profiles, precise culture conditions, and substrate preferences for cellulase, demonstrating the strong utility of this tool. Compared with traditional LLMs, particularly GPT-4o, MEPAM exhibited superior performance, achieving significantly higher answer accuracy (0.86 vs. 0.52) and nearly eliminating hallucinations. MEPAM is available at http://180.76.108.212. This framework provides context-rich, verifiable insights, thus bridging predictive modeling with experimental validation to facilitate the exploration of microbial enzymatic systems.

Indexed as

Enzyme production and catalysisKnowledge graph–enhanced LLMsPrompt engineeringQuestion-answering systemRetrieval-augmented generation

Identifiers

PMID42371480
PMCPMC13310620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.