ArticleCureus2026
Habitual Physical Activity and Walking Endurance Following Inpatient Rehabilitation in Children With Cerebral Palsy.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07628465 (Differential Learning Enhances Motor Performance and Retention in Sport Science Students), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Differential Learning Enhances Motor Performance and Retention in Sport Science Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral palsy (CP) at GMFCS level II is the most functionally heterogeneous ambulatory group, with high intra-group variability in walking endurance and daily physical activity. The relationship between six-minute walk test (6MWT) outcomes and accelerometer-based monitoring following inpatient rehabilitation remains unclear.
aimThe aim of this study was to assess correlations between wear-time-normalised habitual physical activity (PA) parameters and rehabilitation-induced change in walking endurance, and to determine whether objectively measured spatiotemporal gait parameters explain the inverse relationship between metabolic equivalent of task (MET)-based PA classification and baseline 6MWT performance in this population.
methodsTwenty-five children with CP at GMFCS II (female: 10, male: 15; age: 13.40 ± 1.12 years) completed a two-week inpatient rehabilitation programme. The 6MWT was performed on the first and final day. PA was monitored over 72 hours using a wearable device, which was removed during sleep, bathing, and activities that might cause damage to the device; data were not recorded during structured therapy sessions. Participants were classified as active (n = 13) or inactive (n = 12). Analysis included paired t-test, Pearson and Spearman correlations, Mann-Whitney U test, and Cohen's d
resultsSignificant improvement in 6MWT distance was observed in the entire group (moderate effect), and the active subgroup (medium-to-large effect); no improvement was found in the inactive subgroup. No significant correlations between normalised PA measures and 6MWT improvement were identified. At baseline, the active subgroup showed lower 6MWT distance despite higher step accumulation. Between-group PA differences were significant. Spatiotemporal analysis revealed inefficient gait biomechanics in the active subgroup (lower walking speed, shorter step and stride length, longer stance phase). An exploratory analysis found a negative correlation between baseline 6MWT and rehabilitation-induced change in the inactive subgroup.
conclusionsTwo weeks of inpatient rehabilitation produced clinically meaningful improvements in walking endurance, particularly in the active subgroup. Habitual PA intensity and endurance gains were not correlated. Inefficient gait biomechanics in the active subgroup may help explain the paradoxical inverse relationship between MET classification and baseline 6MWT performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.