ArticleCureus2026
Barriers to Helicopter Emergency Medical Service Operations in Nepal: A Retrospective Study of Mission Cancellations.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) play an important role in geographically challenging regions such as Nepal, where mountainous terrain, limited road infrastructure, and remote settlements can delay access to advanced medical care. However, mission cancellations remain a significant operational challenge and may reduce system efficiency and timely patient transfer. Objective The study aimed to analyse the reasons for HEMS mission cancellations at a tertiary care centre in Nepal and identify the financial, operational, environmental, and patient-related factors influencing HEMS utilisation. Methods A retrospective observational study was conducted using HEMS coordination data from Mediciti Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, between February 2023 and July 2024. All cancelled HEMS missions during the study period were included. Cancellation reasons were categorised using data from the hospital's call register book and analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages. Results During the 18-month study period, 407 HEMS calls were recorded. Of these, 249 missions (61.1%) were completed, and 158 missions (38.8%) were cancelled. Financial constraints were the most common reason for cancellation (54 missions, 34.18%), followed by miscellaneous operational causes (18 missions, 11.39%), helicopter unavailability (17 missions, 10.76%), and visual flight rules (VFR) limitations (16 missions, 10.13%). Weather-related factors accounted for 12 cancellations (7.59%), while night operation limitations contributed to 13 cancellations (8.23%). Patient-related factors, including preference for another medical centre, non-transferable clinical status, and self-transport, accounted for a smaller proportion of cancellations overall. Conclusion Financial and operational limitations were the leading causes of HEMS mission cancellations in this single-centre Nepalese study. Improving financial protection mechanisms, increasing helicopter availability, and expanding night-flight and all-weather operational capability may improve the efficiency and reliability of HEMS delivery in resource-limited mountainous settings. Further multicentre prospective studies are required to better inform sustainable HEMS development in Nepal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.