ReviewCureus2026
Estimating Infarct Size in the Troponin Era: Why No Biomarker Has Replaced Creatine Kinase-Myocardial Band Area Under the Curve (CK-MB AUC) and Where the Field Must Go Next.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infarct size remains a clinically meaningful determinant of prognosis after myocardial infarction (MI) and an important surrogate endpoint in cardiovascular research. Although cardiac troponins have appropriately replaced creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) for diagnosis because of superior sensitivity and specificity, they have not replaced the quantitative role historically served by serial CK-MB area-under-the-curve (AUC) analysis. Troponin release is prolonged, assay-dependent, and frequently influenced by baseline myocardial injury, making cumulative troponin exposure difficult to interpret as a direct measure of infarct mass. Imaging modalities, especially late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), provide accurate infarct characterization but are limited by cost, access, timing, workflow, and scalability. This narrative review revisits the historical utility of CK-MB AUC, explains why troponin has not provided an equivalent biomarker-based infarct-size estimate, and argues for renewed development of practical biomarker strategies, including kinetic modeling, multi-marker panels, and novel biomarkers designed specifically for infarct-size quantification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.