Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371332›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2026

Net zero emission MR imaging using a permanent 0.4 T magnet.

Hans-Martin Klein

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hans-Martin KleinClinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany. mklein@greenscan-imaging.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3218-1945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRadiology, particularly superconducting MRI, accounts for a significant share of healthcare energy consumption. We aimed to achieve zero-emission MR imaging by combining a permanent-magnet MRI with a solar energy system. MATERIAL/

methodsWe installed a 30-kW peak rooftop solar array on an energy-efficient building. We used a permanent-magnet MRI system with a 0.4 T field strength, 25 mT gradients, and a 55 T/m/s slew rate. We installed a 22 kWh LiFePO4 battery for short-term energy storage. A smart consumer controller routed solar energy as the primary source. Surplus solar energy was fed into the power grid. If solar production was too low, energy was purchased from the grid. In the event of a grid failure with no available solar energy, a high-voltage DC generator would supply grid energy. Energy consumption and solar energy production were analyzed from January 2024 to December 2025.

resultsTotal energy consumption in 2025 was 22,992 kWh. Total energy production in 2025 was 30,823 kWh. Total grid feed in 2025 was 16,364 kWh. Total energy retrieved from the grid in 2025 was 8948 kWh. From May to August 2025, the practice operated grid independent for more than 94% of the time. The practice's energy balance was positive (negative CO

conclusionA permanent-magnet MRI, combined with a solar power system, enabled grid-independent operation with net negative CO

Indexed as

EnvironmentHealth services accessibilityMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.