Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42371293›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2026

A novel deep learning-based grading system for assessing breast arterial calcification on mammograms, as an independent risk factor for predicting adverse cardiovascular events.

Mu'ath Ibrahim, Patrick C Brennan, Mo'ayyad E Suleiman, Mary Rickard, Clare Arnott, Jennifer Y Barraclough, Seyedamir Tavakoli Taba, Ziba Gandomkar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mu'ath IbrahimThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. mibr5935@uni.sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4542-6745
Patrick C BrennanThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Mo'ayyad E SuleimanThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Mary RickardThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Clare ArnottThe George Institute for Global Health, Level 18, International Towers 3, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo, NSW, 2000, Australia.
Jennifer Y BarracloughThe George Institute for Global Health, Level 18, International Towers 3, 300 Barangaroo Avenue, Barangaroo, NSW, 2000, Australia.
Seyedamir Tavakoli TabaThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Ziba GandomkarThe University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a deep learning-based framework for automated detection and grading of breast arterial calcification (BAC) on mammograms, and to evaluate its association with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective case-control study used two datasets: SegModel (1270 mammograms with BAC annotations) and MACEPred (3190 mammographic cases of women with MACE, plus 6458 controls). A U-Net segmentation model and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for four BAC grading strategies: binary categorization, area-based grading (none, mild, moderate, severe), intensity-based grading, and a combined approach.

findingsThe U-Net attained a Jaccard similarity coefficient of 0.582, accuracy of 0.996, precision of 0.801, F1 score of 0.756, and recall of 0.716 in segmenting BAC. The presence of BAC was associated with an adjusted HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.10-1.23). For area-based grading, the HRs for mild, moderate, and severe grades were 1.13 (95% CI 1.06-1.20), 1.30 (95% CI 1.18-1.45), and 1.58 (95% CI 1.15-2.18), respectively. Intensity-based grading showed respective HRs of 1.08 (95% CI 1.00-1.17), 1.10 (95% CI 1.01-1.20), and 1.18 (95% CI 1.09-1.28). The combined approach demonstrated respective HRs of 1.102 (95% CI 1.04-1.17), 1.249 (95% CI 1.14-1.37), and 1.654 (95% CI 1.30-2.10) for mild, moderate, and severe grades.

conclusionOur study presents a novel automated framework for BAC assessment that provides independent insights into cardiovascular risk in women. Combined area and intensity grading reflected increasing MACE risk across BAC severity levels, although its incremental predictive improvement was limited.

Indexed as

Breast arterial calcificationCardiovascular risk predictionDeep learningMammographyWomen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.